AMD reminds the world that it has 8-core CPUs, too - hambybuir1998

While Intel was announcing a high-end unlocked 8-core Central processor supported its Haswell architecture last week, AMD was briefing the iron on new unsecured octa-core CPUs of its own. But AMD isn't making nip and tuck performance comparisons between its modish FX-series processors and Intel's top-ledge parts. AMD is competing on price, pitting its best CPUs against Intel's second- and third-tier processors: the Core i5 and Core i3 series.

AMD announced triplet brand-new 8-core processors today—the 4GHz FX-8370 and 3.3GHz FX-8370E ($200 each), and the 3.2GHz FX 8320e ($147). AMD too reduced the prices on its other high-end processors, including its best—the FX-9590—which is now loss for $230. Intel, meanwhile, expects to bring $1000 for the fastest Haswell-E series CPU IT declared last week: the Core i7-5960X.

AMD announced trio new CPUs in its FX lineup and a sunrise lower cost for its to-cease partially.

AMD is focusing on two primary applications for its new CPUs: Content creation and gaming beyond 1080p declaration. But information technology's too targeting budget-priced systems, describing an theoretical "enthusiast play Personal computer" power-driven by an FX-9590 Central processing unit, a video card with a Radeon R9 290X artwork processor, and 16GB of DDR3/2133 memory that would trade for $1499. AMD says a system builder could sell a "functioning gaming PC" with an FX-8370 Central processing unit, a video card with a Radeon R9 285 GPU, and 16GB of DDR3/1866 memory for just $1099.

In the region of content creation, AMD says its Ashcan School-core FX-8370 and FX-9590 can significantly outdo Intel's quad-core Core i5-4690K in tasks such as converting images from RAW data format to JPEG. Only time is money for professional photographers and videographers, and many of them might be willing to spend Thomas More cash up front to get to a greater extent processing power from systems built around Intel's high-end Core i7 CPUs.

AMD claims its FX-serial processors are a better selection than Intel's when it comes to message creation. But they don't compete with anything on the far side an Intel Core i5.

AMD's overall CPU applied science is acquiring a bit long in the tooth. All of the companion's octa-core processors—including the three announced today—are based connected the Piledriver microarchitecture information technology launched in mid 2012. The Steamroller architecture AMD announced earlier this year is limited to CPUs with a maximum of four cores.

Where Intel builds its fourth-generation Core processors victimisation a 22nm manufacturing processor, AMD quiet relies on a 32nm process to build information technology FX-series parts. And the fifth part-generation Core processors Intel is about to launch are built using a 14nm process. AMD besides lags badly along power consumption. Intel's most powerful consumer CPUs, the Haswell-E series, have thermal design power (TDP) ratings of 140 watts. AMD's best CPU, FX-9590, has a TDP of 220 watts. AMD's new FX-8370 fares a trifle punter, with a TDP of 125 watts; and its FX-8370E and FX-8320E both have TDPs of 95 watts.

AMD sent us a motherboard and some try out CPUs late last workweek so we could run our own benchmarks. We're edifice extinct a discharge benchmark rig and will report soon on how the raw parts perform.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/434977/amd-reminds-the-world-that-it-has-8-core-cpus-too.html

Posted by: hambybuir1998.blogspot.com

Share this post